Gotta love anyone who makes the argument about taxing W2 "rich" people more.....
Meet the new masters at the helm. Same as the old masters at the helm. Not gonna do shit...
We often talk about the staggering amount of cash some of the biggest multinationals are holding, so I want to take a peek at that, courtesy of some of the top names in tech.
Specifically, I spent some time searching the latest SEC filings to see just how much cash some major techs have in overseas bank accounts where it's not subject to U.S. taxes.
Here's a snapshot: Percentage-wise,(MSFT) near the top of the list, with 87 percent of its $66.6 billion outside the U.S. (CSCO) not far behind at 83 percent of its $45 billion, (ORCL) at 80 percent of $31.6 billion, (AAPL) at 68 percent of $121.3 billion, and (GOOG) at 64 percent of $45.7 billion.
Why is all that cash over there? It's not necessarily because they're hiding it. A big part of the reason is that they've become global growth stories.
When Microsoft sells product overseas, the proceeds naturally go into an overseas account. The money doesn't come to the U.S. unless Microsoft needs to buy something here.
This is actually a big issue for a company like Cisco, where John Chambers has been very straightforward about saying if the feds let him bring this cash to the U.S. without a big tax bill, he'll hire in the U.S. If not, he'll hire a lot less.
Also, there's the acquisition wrinkle: Cisco used to do nearly all of its big acquisitions in the U.S.
But as domestic targets have gotten more expensive and the proportion of Cisco's cash it's generating outside the U.S. remains steady at about 80 percent, it's harder to buy anything big. Not only does Cisco have to look at the purchase price of its target, it has to add another 30 percent or so to factor in the cost of repatriating the cash.
Chambers said just last week that Cisco has gone too long without a big acquisition. Given the dynamics here, you've got to wonder: Does that mean he's about to make a major overseas buy?