San Diego Housing Market News and Analysis
~Welcome to the Econo-Almanac~
I started this website in mid-2004 to chronicle San Diego’s spectacular housing bubble. The purpose of the site remains, as ever, to provide objective and evidence-based analysis of the San Diego housing market. A quick guide to the site follows:
Thanks for stopping by…
Submitted by Rich Toscano on August 10, 2005 - 6:26pm
I have routinely argued that the inevitable slowdown in San Diego housing activity and price growth will lead to local economic hardship. This topic is discussed in some detail here and here, but the basic reasoning is as follows:
If our friends over in the United Kingdom are any indication, I could be onto something. The UK, as you probably know, experienced a home price bubble of downright San Diego-like proportions. As this graph shows, the similarity is quite striking:
Submitted by Rich Toscano on July 31, 2005 - 9:36pm
The trouble with real estate sales data is that it is invariably out of date. DataQuick's stats for June, for example, consists of all sales that closed in June, mean that those sales were negotiated in May or even April. Furthermore, DQ takes its time getting the data all cleaned up, and by the time I get the June numbers it is almost the end of July. (I am looking into some ways to get a more timely if less precise picture of sales activity, but that's not ready to go yet.)
Inventory data, on the other hand, is real-time. I can get the number of homes for sale right now. But while there is no lag, MLS inventory has its own issue: it only takes account of homes listed for resale on the MLS, excluding many units available in new developments.
I mention this not just as a reminder of the importance of looking at the market in many different ways, but also because it's important to keep data limitations in mind while translating individual stats into a "big picture" interpretation of what's going on. This is especially true when we see a bit of a divergence between sales data and inventory data—as we did this month.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on July 29, 2005 - 9:40pm
The local economy isn't showing any signs of short term trouble. Notices of default remain flat, indicating that those overleveraged San Diego homeowners haven't gotten themselves into serious trouble just yet.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on July 27, 2005 - 9:42pm
There was big news in the bond market this month: China has finally relented to international pressure and revalued its currency. After over a decade of being pegged at a fixed rate to the dollar, the Chinese yuan was allowed to appreciate by 2.1% and will be pegged to an unspecified basket of currencies rather than to the dollar itself.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on July 17, 2005 - 9:50pm
Reader Jonathan writes:
This is an interesting question. Low rates and rock-bottom underwriting standards are national phenomena; why have prices grown so much faster in San Diego than in most of the country?
Submitted by Rich Toscano on July 16, 2005 - 9:52pm
In the first bond rate article, I discussed several factors that have helped to keep long-term yields low. The piece concluded thusly:
It's quite the virtuous cycle, for now, and bond yields will continue to remain low as long as all these factors remain in place. But how long will they remain in place?
Submitted by Rich Toscano on July 9, 2005 - 9:55pm
It is counterintuitive that US long-term interest rates have remained so low in the face of Fed rate hikes, record low household savings, record high trade and fiscal deficits, steeply rising energy and commodity prices, and unprecedented home equity-related wealth creation. This article discusses five factors that have interacted to help keep rates so low in spite of the above.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 30, 2005 - 9:58pm
While I remain as concerned as ever about the eventual fate of San Diego real estate, this past month's housing market data reinforces the messages found in the economic and credit market data: San Diego housing does not appear to be under any imminent threat of decline.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 23, 2005 - 9:59pm
My extensive rambling notwithstanding, the Econo-Almanac really has one primary purpose: to determine what's going to happen to the San Diego housing market before it actually happens. With this goal in mind, I've developed two "price instability indicators" to identify declining pricing power before it actually shows up in the countywide median price figures.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 22, 2005 - 10:01pm
As I've prattled on about endlessly, generational-low interest rates are a critical element in allowing San Diego home prices to remain so high compared to incomes. One cannot, therefore, gauge the health of the real estate market without understanding the health of the credit market.
Not that it's terribly easy to do so—the greatest financial minds in the world cannot seem to agree with each other about what drives the bond markets and where yields will go. As a matter of fact, they can't even agree with themselves.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 19, 2005 - 8:34pm
If San Diego home prices do not reflect fundamentals, exactly how did they get to such rarified heights, and what keeps them aloft? It's a fair question, and an important one: understanding how the bubble started will be crucial in identifying how and when the bubble ends. The purpose of this article is to provide a very brief overview of how we got here.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 1, 2005 - 10:04pm
The last real estate bust in San Diego was precipitated by a local recession, as thousands of aerospace and defense industry employees lost their jobs and were forced to sell their homes. This fact appears to have engendered an oft-repeated theory that San Diego home prices cannot drop unless we experience a recession. Such a line of reasoning may be comforting, but it is deeply flawed.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 21, 2005 - 10:10pm
All San Diegans should consider reading the Money Magazine article entitled Boomtown USA to get an understanding of what's happening in our city. The article concerns San Diego's multi-year housing runup in general, but in particular it spends a lot of time detailing the resulting perceptual distortions on the part of our citizenry.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on April 21, 2005 - 10:15pm
An article in today's Economist concerning the global housing bubble contains this stunning claim:
"A recent survey of buyers in Los Angeles indicated that they expected their homes to increase in value by a whopping 22% a year over the next decade."Let me get this straight. Real estate is, by every conceivable measure, far more expensive than it's ever been. Homes are already so incredibly expensive that most people can't buy one unless they take out a teaser-rate mortgage or they have a pile of cash from the sale of their prior home. Affordability is at an all-time low, despite the fact that interest rates are about as low as they've been since the 1950s. And from these lofty heights, homebuyers are expecting prices to rise a staggering 22% a year for the next decade?
Submitted by Rich Toscano on April 18, 2005 - 10:17pm
Yesterday the UT ran a story concerning the rampant condo speculation that continues to infest our fine city. I highly recommend reading it if you haven't done so already.
The various data (e.g. the fact that 37% of 2004 condo conversion buyers were speculators) is very interesting, if not terribly surprising. The interviews, on the other hand, are just jaw-dropping, as they really hammer home the enormous amount of money being spent on the basis of threadbare and entirely emotional analysis.
~Active forum topics~