Constitution pretty vague really.

Member logins have been temporarily disabled. Please try again later.
User Forum Topic
Submitted by scaredyclassic on May 30, 2020 - 9:00am

So no more screaming, ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

5 -4 split. Churches gotta close. If one judge were in a diff mood they could stay open.

Anyone who says tgey know what will happen is wrong. No one knows what the future brings.

Instead say, it might be unconstitutional.
Might be constitutional. . Depends on whats blowin in the change. A virus...

Submitted by svelte on May 31, 2020 - 8:50am.

I have often mused at how many SC decisions are 5-4.

Such important and permanent decisions made with what appears to be the chance of a coin toss. If just one person on the court had been someone else, the decision could have went the other way.

Really kinda spooky to think about.

On the other hand, the reason cases usually make it to the SC is that there were mixed decisions downstream. The answer wasn't even clear to the lower courts, so a 5-4 decision seems consistent with the situation.

All in how you look at it I guess.

Submitted by phaster on May 31, 2020 - 10:00am.

Trump Needs A Factcheck on How Twitter, the First Amendment, and Section 230 Operate

Submitted by outtamojo on May 31, 2020 - 10:47pm.

Apparently kavanaugh is an activist judge

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.