San Diego Housing Market News and Analysis
Analysis of the (primarily) San Diego housing market.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 22, 2006 - 8:40pm
Low rates have been one of the mainstays of the bullish arsenal. But given that mortgage rates are where they were four years ago, then they shouldn't be a factor in explaining any price difference that has taken place during that time period.
So if we take rates out of the picture, we are left with population, housing stock, inflation, and incomes: all factors that would affect both rents and home prices. Which is to say, if rates are the same now as they were four years ago, why should home prices have risen so much more than rents during that time?
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 13, 2006 - 2:52pm
As if on cue (given the housing market report's discussion of an imminent shift in sentiment), the Union-Tribune has released an article with the gloomy title "San Diego County home prices take a tumble."
I believe we'll be seeing a lot more headlines like this in the future...
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 12, 2006 - 8:23pm
The party is officially over. This is no great surprise, and we've seen it coming for months. But what's different now is that there is no longer any question that the home price downturn has begun.
At the beginning of 2005, we were in a situation where prices had been flat since the summer, inventory had risen substantially, and sales volume was down. Things didn't look terribly promising for the market. But rates remained fairly low, and lenders tried to drive more volume by pushing non-traditional mortgage products that lowered initial monthly payments. The resulting bump in demand fed a little spring rally, and the spring of 2005 actually saw a bit of a rise in median home prices.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on June 11, 2006 - 12:51pm
Last week featured a couple of interesting housing articles in the local press.
At voiceofsandiego.org, Will Carless has dug up some really compelling info for an article on mortgage resets. Specifically, an estimated 50% of all San Diego mortgage debt has been borrowed at an adjustable rate that will reset by 2010. If rates don't stay nice and low over the next four years all these resets will make a bad situation worse. (This is another clue that the 2010-2011 timeframe might be a good time to start buying San Diego homes hand over fist).
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 31, 2006 - 3:36pm
Tomorrow's voiceofsandiego.org column, a link to which will be available on the upper right of the page*, concerns the shortcomings of the median price as a gauge of broad pricing power.
The executive summary is that the median price does a good job of measuring how much people are willing to spend on housing, but there is a margin of error in translating that to changes in the market price of a given property. Depending on the dynamics involved, this error can go either way: the median price overstated price growth until 2003, after which time it began to understate actual price growth. As has been discussed in the forums, we seem to be getting back to a situation where median prices are once again overstating housing market pricing power.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 23, 2006 - 4:31pm
Check out The Big Picture for a good take on why the "it's ok because interest rates are low" gambit is so ridiculous. In short, it is because it is the directional change in rates from the time you buy the asset, and not the actual level of rates at which you buy the asset, that matters:
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 15, 2006 - 8:57pm
Who spiked the water cooler at the Union-Tribune office? Or, maybe, who stopped spiking it?
Ah, I kid because I love. But seriously, their latest piece on the sharp rise in mortgage defaults is unusually somber. And it has some cool graphs.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 10, 2006 - 8:54am
Señor Risk has published an interesting chart showing that Californians' rush into real estate as a career is still going strong. There is still optimisim aplenty out there.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 9, 2006 - 10:11am
Will Carless at voiceofsandiego.org wrote a piece yesterday on San Diego's rising foreclosure rate. That's certainly an ominous sign, as a surge of "must-sell" inventory is the most likely catalyst to drive prices substantially lower at some point. But foreclosures are rising off their "everyone has a huge equity cushion"-lows and are still fairly contained, from a historical perspective. So while the directional growth trend is bad news, the amount of foreclosures is not as of yet a big problem.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 7, 2006 - 4:27pm
The market is starting to give us a more conclusive view of what's to come. This month's report will check in on the widely-expected spring rally and will use the resulting conclusions to forecast where things may go from here.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on May 1, 2006 - 6:07pm
I found an interesting tidbit on the Housing Bubble Blog. A researcher looking at historical California inventory levels found that once the supply of homes hits 9 months worth of sales, median prices fall "on a consistent basis." This is a statewide stat, but it at least gives us some general insight as to the location of that line in the sand past which increased inventory starts to push prices south.
In regard to price declines, what's more important than the overall inventory level is the amount of "distressed" inventory supplied by owners who have to sell at whatever price they can get. But those two numbers tend to trend up and down together.
As I will discuss more in the monthly housing report (which is coming very soon, and will include new data sources to provide a more current read on the market than is supplied by DataQuick) the combined condo and SFR inventory in San Diego is currently a little below 8 months.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on April 19, 2006 - 8:34am
Will Carless at voiceofsandiego.org has written a piece about an apparent exodus of wealthy investors from San Diego real estate. It has an interesting bit of data: 18% of San Diego home purchases last year were made for investment purposes. (This is out-and-out investing, not the stealth speculation I discussed last week).
Elsewhere in the article, various financial advisors tell us that it may be a good time to unload those alligators. "If you have an investment property, this is a wonderful time to get the heck out," counsels one. I completely agree... though I would posit that last year would have been an even more wonderful time.
Submitted by Rich Toscano on April 17, 2006 - 9:23am
The Union-Tribune recently issued a piece about last month's housing numbers. As is usual in the media these days, the tone was "cautiously optimistic." In other words, things have seriously slowed down, but the median price is still hanging in there... so things are going to be fine, right? Karevoll illustrates the sentiment nicely:
Submitted by Rich Toscano on April 10, 2006 - 11:08am
Calculated Risk informs us that the new guidance on non-traditional mortgages may be with us in a few months.
Lansner at the OC Register is worrying about late tax payments, correctly identifying that homeowners are starting to get squeezed now that rates are rising and prices have flattened.
And—I know this is week-old news, but it bears repeating—the wonderful folks at the NAR inform us that 40% of homes purchased last year were for investment or vacation purposes. That, friends, is a little something we call speculative excess. But it's ok, says NAR: "Some of these purchases may be a third, fourth or fifth investment property, showing that housing is a good investment." Huh?
Submitted by Rich Toscano on April 4, 2006 - 10:03am
Below we will take a look at the action in the housing market as we wrap up the winter season. Data to be crunched includes prices, price growth (or shrinkage) between varying regions, sales volume, and inventory. We'll also discuss the merits of the "median price" statistic as an indicator for real estate pricing power.
~Active forum topics~